Legal Opinion

Cox v. Clanton

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 2002No. 27020PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice.

The Coxes and the Maupins purchased property and made improvements upon land they believed they owned. A subsequent survey of the property revealed that the appellants did not own the land; the respondents held title to the disputed property. The appellants filed a quiet title action, and the district court quieted title in the respondents. The appellants appeal.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The plaintiffs bought parcels of land in separate purchases from Merlin Sharp (Sharp). Terry and Mindy Maupin purchased land from Sharp in December of 1998; the Coxes’ purchase occurred…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brower v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Beneficial Life Ins. Co. v. WakamatsuIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Northwest Bec-Corp. v. Home Living ServiceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Edgeller v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Paurley v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Owen v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Neider v. ShawIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Teton Peaks Investment Co. v. OhmeIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Luce v. MarbleIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Downey v. VavoldIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API