Legal Opinion

Brown v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 14, 2007No. 07-277 CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

I. Pleadings

The court has before it Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed Informa Pauperis (Motion or Pl.’s Mot.), filed on May 3, 2007, along with his Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (Complaint or Compl.). Defendant had up to and including May 21, 2007, to file a Response to plaintiffs Motion but did not do so.

II. Statutory Scheme

In forma pauperis (IFP) applications seek to invoke the court’s power to “authorize the commencement ... of any suit, action or proceeding ... without prepayment of fees or security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) (2000). Specifically,

any court of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Evelyn Martinez v. Kristi Kleaners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Roynell Joshua v. The United States, on MotionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  4. James A. Watson v. Dr. Allen L. Ault, William Purdue v. Dr. Allen L. Ault, Director, William A. Durham v. Oree ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Hayes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ilaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Barnard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Bennett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  4. Brestle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Hymas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API