Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Class

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1994No. 18650PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

Mitchell appeals from denial of petition for writ of habeas corpus based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

FACTS

The facts are set out in detail in State v. Mitchell, 491 N.W.2d 438 (S.D.1992). Mitchell married S.D.’s mother in October, 1978. S.D. was eight years old at that time. Mitchell and S.D.’s relationship began to deteriorate when S.D. became a teenager. He began counselling S.D. that she should begin dating, that boys would expect her to have intercourse with them, and that she should go on birth control pills. He also told her that she could…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. State v. DaviSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. Luna v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Loop v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Meinders v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. McGillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Davi v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API