Legal Opinion
State v. McGill
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 1995No. 18802PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
Michael McGill (McGill) appeals his conviction for stalking in violation of SDCL 22-19A-1. We affirm.
FACTS
McGill introduced himself to Lisa W. (Victim) in 1978. He soon developed romantic feelings for her, stating that she “appealed to me more than anybody at that point.” Victim did not reciprocate these feelings, nor did she encourage any relationship.
Almost immediately after the two met, McGill started calling Victim’s parents’ home trying to contact her. She did not live with her parents and her phone number was unlisted. Unable to talk to her personally, McGill professed…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Commonwealth v. UrrutiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- State v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Streater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- State v. EdelmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.