Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Lawler

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 16, 1931No. 8 Div. 265PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The plaintiff claims the property sued for under the foreclosure sale of a mortgage executed by defendant to Corinth Bank .& Trust- Company, dated December 2, 1921. Defendant claims that at the time of the foreclosure there was nothing due on the mortgage. Whether that was the situation was the chief issue of fact in this ease tried by the judge-without a jury.

After the execution of that mortgage which secured an individual debt of appellee, he conducted -business with H. R. Feltman as Feltman & Co. That company did business with the bank and purchased cotton under an arrangement, by which…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Warten v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Miller v. Cannon & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  3. Cole v. . SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Corinth Bank & Trust Co. v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. In re the Estate of BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Poston v. GaddisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Milford v. Tenn. River Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Kemp Motor Sales, Inc. v. LawrenzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co. v. SciandraSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Dennis v. DennisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API