Flynn v. Merck
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Our Code, Chapter 61-3, prescribes the procedure at law for dispossessing a tenant, and § 61-303 affords one who has been proceeded against by dispossessory warrant a full and adequate legal remedy. It is there provided that the tenant may arrest such dispossessory proceedings by declaring on oath that his lease or term has not expired, that he is not holding over, or that the rent is not due or “that he does not hold the premises, either by lease, or rent, or at will, or by sufferance, or otherwise from the person who made the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrison v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Sims v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Pope v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Napier v. VarnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Harvey v. Atlanta & Lowry National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reardon v. BlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Schoen v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Ehrlich v. TeagueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Merck v. FlynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Hall v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.