Morrison v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
1. Where one who can read signs a contract without apprising himself of its contents, otherwise than by accepting representations made by the opposite party, with whom there exists no fiduciary or confidential relation, he can not defend an action based on it, or have it canceled or reformed, on the ground that it does not contain the contract actually made, unless it should appear that at the time he signed it some such emergency existed as would excuse his failure to read it, or that his failure to read it was brought about by some misleading artifice or device perpetrated…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lewis v. FoySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Bearden Mercantile Co. v. Madison Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Tinsley v. Gullett Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Stoddard Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Grimmett v. BarnwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Cochran v. MurrahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Smith v. Standard Oil CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Kienel v. LanierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Dawes Mining Co. v. CallahanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Conklin v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.