Brown v. Thurstin
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Neosho district court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Graves, J.:
This is an action for rent of real estate. The property was owned and occupied by J. F. Pullen and wife. Pullen died testate, leaving his wife and nine children as his heirs at law. He owned, at the time of his death, three improved lots in the city.of *126Chanute. The character of the improvements does not appear. His children were all past the age of majority when he died, and were not living with him. His wife was not the mother of the children. By his will he bequeathed one lot to his wife, some personal property to five of his children, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Israel v. IsraelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Pico v. ColumbetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Everts v. BeachMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Scantlin v. AllisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Reynolds v. WilmethSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Speer v. ShipleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Eysenbach v. NaharkeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Utah Oil Refining Co. v. LeighUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- Tanner v. Provo Reservoir Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1930