Legal Opinion

Tanner v. Provo Reservoir Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1930No. 4765PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action by which he contends he is “seeking to establish"his water rights” in the irrigation system of the defendant Provo Reservoir Company. One of the principal items of controversy is whether or not, as the owner of 20% shares of “primary water right” in the above company, he may require the company to deliver him water through its high line or main canal to the point of “general delivery,” or whether he must accept this water through a lower ditch, referred to as the canal of the Provo Bench Canal & Irrigation Company.

The pleadings occupy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hilton v. SloanUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Brown v. ThurstinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Arnold v. Huntington Canal & Reservoir Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Swan Creek Village Homeowners Ass'n v. WarneUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Big Ditch Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Utah State Building Commission Ex Rel. Mountain States Supply Co. v. Great American Indemnity Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API