Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Town of East Hampton
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEXLER, District Judge.
In this action challenging the validity of a local zoning law, Group for the South Fork, Inc. (the “Group”) requests leave to intervene as defendants either as of right under Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a)(2), or alternatively, as a matter of discretion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(b)(2). For the reasons set forth below, the Group’s motion is denied with leave to renew at a later stage of the litigation.
FACTS
In 1996, defendant Town of East Hampton 1 adopted and filed with the State of New York a local zoning law, officially known as Local Law No. 17 of 1996 (the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., Edo Corporation Plessey, Inc. Vernitron Corp., Baii Banking Corp., Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Edwards v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Norman Purnell, Administrator of the Estate of Armstead Land, A/K/A Armstad Land v. City of Akron v. Damon Campbell Carissa CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Commonwealth of Virginia, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CallahanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Federal Trade Commission v. First Capital Consumer Membership Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2001
- Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. City of White PlainsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Schwartz v. Town of Huntington Zoning Board of AppealsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Building and Realty Institute of Westchester and Putnam Counties, Inc. v. State Of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.