Legal Opinion

National Holding Co. v. Title Insurance & Title Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1941No. Civ. 12377PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent after the sustaining of a general demurrer to plaintiffs’ complaint as amended, without leave to amend further.

The action is one brought upon a policy of title insurance to recover a sum of money expended by appellants in the extinguishment of a certain tax lien. Upon this appeal from a judgment after demurrer the truth of the facts as alleged in the complaint must be presumed, and the sole question presented is whether those facts as stated constitute a cause of action against respondent as defendant.

The complaint as amended alleges…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hayes v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Couts v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. City of Santa Monica v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Coast Mutual Building-Loan Ass'n v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hocking v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Overholtzer v. Northern Counties Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Hansen v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Herbil Holding Co. v. Commonwealth Land Title InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Securities Service, Inc. v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API