BACKUS v. APISHAPA LAND & CATTLE CO.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.
Albert Lee Backus instituted this action against Apishapa Land and Cattle Company to recover under a listing agreement for the sale of real property. The trial court granted Apishapa’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Before filing an answer, Apishapa filed its motion for summary judgment pursuant to C.R.C.P. 56(b), and neither party filed affidavits or other supporting documents. Consequently, in reviewing the judgment, the facts alleged in the complaint, being the only facts before us, are accepted as true. See Tamblyn v. Denver, 118 Colo. 191,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Abrahamsen v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Benham v. HeydeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- Farmers Acceptance Corp. v. DeLozierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Dass v. EpplenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Tamblyn v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dudding v. Norton Frickey & AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Interbank Investments, LLC v. Eagle River Water & Sanitation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Tivoli Ventures, Inc. v. BumannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Lawry v. PalmColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Idaho Lumber, Inc. v. BuckIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.