Legal Opinion

Dass v. Epplen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 6, 1967No. 21313PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Hodges.

Plaintiffs in error, Alano and Roxanna Dass, were defendants in the trial court and the defendants in error, Frederick W., John W. and Helen Epplen, were the plaintiffs below. The parties will be referred to here as the Dasses and the Epplens.

The controversy in this case stems from the failure of the Epplens, as buyers, and the Dasses, as sellers, upon the closing statement of a real estate transaction, to adjust an amount of $1375. This sum, previously paid some six years before the closing, represented the last five months rent at $275 per month on a ten year…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wistrand v. LEACH REALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Valley Realty & Investment Co. v. McMillanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Certified Fire Protection, Inc. v. Precision Construction, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Leasepartners Corp. v. Robert L. Brooks TrustNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Martinez v. Continental EnterprisesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. Cablevision of Breckenridge, Inc. v. Tannhauser Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. Unionamerica Mortgage & Equity Trust v. McDonaldNevada Supreme Court · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API