Legal Opinion
Tivoli Ventures, Inc. v. Bumann
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 21, 1994No. 92SC838PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
We granted certiorari to review Tivoli Ventures, Inc. v. Tallman, 852 P.2d 1310 (Colo.App.1992). The issue is whether the statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2415(a) (1988) is applicable when the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), acting as receiver for a failed bank, assigns a promissory note to a private party. The district court held that the federal statute of limitations is applicable. The court of appeals reversed and held that a private party is not entitled to sue within the expanded time limit provided by the federal statute of limitations. We disagree, and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,654 William L. Gunter and Camille S. Gunter v. Theodore M. HutchesonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Richard M. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter v. Roy William Bledsoe, Defendant-Counter Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- HOLY CROSS CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST v. WolfTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. Ruth G. Thornburg Michael D. Thornburg David Jean Thornburg Kathy Ann NorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Mortgage Investments Corp. v. Battle Mountain Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Investment Co. of the Southwest v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- WAMCO, III, Ltd. v. First Piedmont Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.