First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
Petitioner applied to the Federal Power Commission for a license to construct a power project on Cedar River in the State of Iowa. The Commission dismissed the application for the reason that, “The applicant has not presented satisfactory evidence, pursuant to Section 9(b) of the Federal Power Act,1 of compliance with the requirements of applicable laws of the State of Iowa requiring a permit from the State Executive Council to effect the purposes of a license under the Federal Power Act * *
On this appeal petitioner admits that it failed to secure a permit from Iowa…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hendricks v. Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2001
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1956
- Fleming v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- United States v. Tanya MannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.