Legal Opinion
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 12, 1956No. 55 C 1883PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LA BUY, District Judge.
The above cause is before the court on two motions: (1) a motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of the City of Chicago, and (2) a motion for temporary injunction filed by the plaintiffs.
These motions are based on the plaintiffs’ complaint for declaratory judgment, together with the documents and exhibits attached thereto; on affidavits and exhibits submitted by the plaintiffs and the defendant-intervenor; and hearings had before the court. No answers have been filed to the complaint by either the City of Chicago or Parmalee, although Parmalee’s petition for…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Stephenson v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Parmelee Transportation Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. RochfordDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
- State ex rel. Smithco Transport Co. v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Campbell v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.