Legal Opinion

McGary v. Pedrorena

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 7,639PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Eighteenth District Court, County of San Diego. McNealy, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Sharpstein, J.:

The respondent brought an action to forclose a mortgage, and in addition to the mortgagor, Pedrorena, made certain other persons, who are alleged to have, or claim to have, some interest in the premises, which is subsequent and subject to the lien of plaintiff’s mortgage, defendants.

Only one of the defendants, Pedrorena, the mortgagor, appeared in the action. He demurred and moved to strike out, and after his demurrer and motion to strike out were overruled, filed an answer to the complaint. Aftewards the plaintiff, by leave of the Court, filed an amended complaint. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Elder v. SpinksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Nichols v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Dahl v. StakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Martin v. CarterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1891
  5. Sucesión Igaravídez v. Rubert HermanosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API