Legal Opinion

In re Rudolph

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1997No. 97-411PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Applicant’s problems with alcohol began in 1990; however, it was only in August 1996, after the July 1996 recommendation of the committee that he not be admitted to the bar, that the applicant began an alcohol rehabilitation program. Given applicant’s six-year history of alcohol problems, we find that his rehabilitation should be tested over a period of time more extensive than the past eight months. Accordingly, applicant will be permitted to reapply to take the *158July 1998 bar examination subject to prior investigation and evaluation by the Dayton Bar Association.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Application of KempOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In re Application of RudolphOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In re Application of KempOhio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API