Legal Opinion

In re Mitchell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1997No. 97-408PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Admission to the practice of law in Ohio requires the applicant “ * * * to establish by clear and convincing evidence the applicant’s present character, fitness, and moral qualifications for admission to the practice of law in Ohio.” Gov.Bar R. I(12)(C)(6). See In re Application of Bower (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 429, 431, 605 N.E.2d 6, 7.

After reviewing the evidence, we agree with the findings and conclusions of the board. At this time, Mitchell has too many unresolved matters relating to his character and fitness to warrant being authorized to take the July 1998 bar examination. The additional…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re BowerOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Application of KempOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In re DickensOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In re FordOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In re Application of MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In re Application of KempOhio Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API