Maples v. Chinese Palace, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
389 So.2d 120 (1980)
Margie MAPLES
v.
The CHINESE PALACE, INC., et al.
78-662.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
August 29, 1980.
Theodore L. Hall, Mobile, for appellant.
Donald M. Briskman, Mobile, for the Chinese Palace, Inc.
Patricia K. Olney and Victor T. Hudson, of Pillans, Reams, Tappan, Wood, Roberts & Vollmer, Mobile, for the Met, Inc.
On Rehearing
2Per curiam
The original opinion is withdrawn and this opinion is substituted for it.
This is an appeal from the dismissal, with prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6), ARCP, of a complaint of ten counts, filed by Margie Maples, the mother of Martha Brannon, a deceased minor,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Age-Herald Pub. Co. v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Eich v. Town of Gulf ShoresSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Brooks v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- King v. HenkieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by23 opinions
- Smith v. SewellTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- King v. National Spa and Pool InstituteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Klingerman v. SOL Corp. of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Smith v. 10th Inning, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Ward v. Rhodes, Hammonds, and Beck, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.