Legal Opinion

Ward v. Rhodes, Hammonds, and Beck, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 10, 1987No. 85-930PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The question presented by this appeal is whether a person injured by an intoxicated person, to whom alcoholic beverages have been sold contrary to the provisions of law, has a claim either under Alabama's Dram Shop Act (Code of 1975, § 6-5-71), or for common law negligence, or under the doctrine of premises liability. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the licensee as to all claims. We hold that the plaintiff stated a claim under the provisions of Alabama's Dram Shop Act; therefore, we reverse and remand as to that claim, but we affirm as to the other two claims.

At the time…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Welch v. Railroad Crossing, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Henley v. Pizitz Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Buchanan v. Merger Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Brooks v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. DeLoach v. Mayer Elec. Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jones v. BP Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. McIsaac v. Monte Carlo Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Parker v. Miller Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Charles J. Arndt, Inc. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Martin v. WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API