Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sewell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1993No. D-1990PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HIGHTOWER, Justice.

In this cause, we consider whether a provider of alcoholic beverages may be responsible for an intoxicated individual’s injury to himself under Chapter 2 of the Alcoholic Beverage Code. After he was severely injured in an auto accident, Randy Sewell (“Sewell”) sued Frank Smith, the operator and owner of a bar, and others under Chapter 2 of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code (“Chapter 2”). The trial court granted summary judgment for Smith and the others. The court of appeals reversed and remanded the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Smith, and affirmed the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Sheehy v. Big Flats Community Day, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Satterfield v. SatterfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Buchanan v. RoseTexas Supreme Court · 1942

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. D. Houston, Inc. v. LoveTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. F.F.P. Operating Partners, L.P. v. DuenezTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Triplex Communications, Inc. v. RileyTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Graff v. BeardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. v. EmmettTexas Supreme Court · 2015

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API