Legal Opinion

Lewin v. Dille

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1852PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Jippeol from, Madison Circuit Court. This was an action of assumpsit on the common counts, begun in 1848. The defendants were owners of the Buckeye Copper Mine, in Madison county, and Ebenezer G. Pomeroy Was their agent to superintend and manage the same. As such agent, he kept a running account with the plaintiff, who was a merchant.

Read the full summary

Jippeol from, Madison Circuit Court. This was an action of assumpsit on the common counts, begun in 1848. The defendants were owners of the Buckeye Copper Mine, in Madison county, and Ebenezer G. Pomeroy Was their agent to superintend and manage the same. As such agent, he kept a running account with the plaintiff, who was a merchant. This suit was for a balance due on account, and also for tbe expenses and salary of plaintiff for a trip to England, under a contract with Pomeroy to sell ore for defendants. The defendants being non-residents, an attachment issued and was levied on their land.…

1Opinion of the CourtRylaND, Judge

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by the plaintiff against the defendants, on the common counts only. There was testimony showing a long continued course of dealing, and running accounts, between the plaintiff and these defendants. The plaintiff was a merchant, and the defendants were the owners of the Buckeye Copper Mines in Madison county. One Pomeroy was the manager and superintending agent of the business of the mines for the defendants. These accounts were made by him with the plaintiff, and were reduced by payments from time to time, leaving a balance due to the plaintiff, being…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Samuels v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1831

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. TurlingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Raming v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. Cummins v. DixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  4. Norvell v. PorterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API