Legal Opinion

East-West Import Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 7, 1955No. C. D. 1716PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

This is a protest against the collector’s assessment of duty on certain chinaware, imported from Japan on or about November 14, 1951, at 70 per centum ad valorem and 10 cents per dozen pieces under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as decorated china tableware. It is claimed that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 45 per centum ad valorem under said paragraph, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, as decorated chinaware, other than tableware.

At the trial, two samples and a photograph representing the merchandise were received in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pacific Guano & Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. W. X. Huber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Gamble & Vargish & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Castelazo & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. Bruce Duncan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API