Legal Opinion

W. X. Huber Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 11, 1947No. C. D. 1074PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OlivbR, Presiding Judge:

This is a protest against the action of the collector of customs at Los Angeles in assessing duties on certain merchandise described on the invoice as “1 case children-toys, composed of papermáché and tin,” imported from Germany. The merchandise was classified under paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930 at 70 per centum ad valorem as toys, not specially provided for. The importer duly filed a protest claiming the merchandise to be properly dutiable under the provisions of paragraph 397 of the same act at 45 per centum ad valorem, presumably as “Articles or wares not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Bloomingdale Bros. & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. Catton, Neill & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. United States v. WanamakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. East-West Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. Palmar Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API