Legal Opinion

Urmston v. State ex rel. Kuehn

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7736PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— This was an action by appellee against Alonzo Urmston and the sureties on his official bond as constable. Relator obtained judgment below, and from that judgment •appellants, who were the sureties of said constable, appeal, the principal, Alonzo Urmston, refusing to join. The only error relied upon by counsel, in their brief, is the overruling of their demurrer to appellee’s complaint. This error is well assigned. It appears that said bond was executed on the 3d day of March, 1875, the condition being as follows : “The condition, of the above obligation is such that, whereas the above named…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rany v. GovernorIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Mullikin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1844

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Detroit Savings Bank v. ZieglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Hawkins v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Baker v. WambaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. State ex rel. Schumacher v. GramelspacherIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Granger v. BoswinkleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API