Detroit Savings Bank v. Ziegler
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to tbe Superior Court of Detroit. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
This suit is upon a bond, given by defendant,Herman H. Ziegler, as principal, and the other defendants as sureties, to secure to the plaintiff the faithful performance of Ziegler’s duties as teller.
The bond is dated February 10,1877. The penalty named is five thousand dollars, and the condition is as follows:
“ The condition of this obligation is such, that whereas the above-bounden Herman H. Ziegler has been appointed receiving teller savings department, and by the terms of the by-laws of said bank,' is made responsible for all such sums of money, property and funds of every description, as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- MINOR v. the Mechanics Bank of AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- McCluskey v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Bullock v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Rochester City Bank v. . ElwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- LaRose v. Logansport National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Saint v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Mason v. Commissioners of Roads & RevenuesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Alabama Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Alabama Penny Sav. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.