Legal Opinion

Mullikin v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1844PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ERROR to the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

— Debt by the state against the plaintiffs in error on the official bond of the agent of the surplus revenue for Fayette county.

The declaration states that at the May term, 1840, of the board of commissioners of Fayette county, Mullihin was appointed the agent of said fund; that he took the oath of office and entered into bond according to law; and that he received from his predecessor in office a large sum of money, to wit, the sum of 10,500 dollars, &c. The breaches are, first, That on the - day of-, 1841, one William Watton was, by the board of commissioners of Fayette *78county, appointed to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Rany v. GovernorIndiana Supreme Court · 1835

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Urmston v. State ex rel. KuehnIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API