Legal Opinion

Rany v. Governor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1835PublishedCited by 9 opinions

ERROR to the Martin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

On the third of March, 1820, Julius Johnson together with Joseph Rany and Philip Davis, his sureties, made their bond to Jonathan Jennings, governor of the state of Indiana, and to his successors in office, by which they bound themselves to pay the sum of 5,000 dollars, conditioned that the said Julius Johnson should well and truly perform the duties and office of sheriff, &c. during and until the general election on the first Monday in August then next succeeding the date of the bond, and until a successor should be elected and qualified; and that he the said Johnson should observe the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Bigelow v. BridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
  3. Thompson v. YoungOhio Supreme Court · 1826

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Houk v. BartholdIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Baker City v. MurphyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Tuley v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Kaw Life Ass'n v. LemkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. Urmston v. State ex rel. KuehnIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API