Legal Opinion

Heldt v. Heldt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 12, 1926No. 16061PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

On July 29, 1922, plaintiff in error as plaintiff commenced this action in the district court cf Noble county against defendant in error as defendant to enforce specific performance of a verbal contract. The parties will be refer-ed to as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff alleges, in substances, that he and defendant entered into a verbal agreement October, 1911, by which defendant sold him the S.y2 of N. E. % of sec. 21, T. 2 N„ R. 1 W., Noble county; that he agreed to pay $2,000 for the property as follows: Assume and pay off an $880 mortgage on the land,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Penny v. VoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Strack v. RoetzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Fulkerson v. MaraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Fulp v. Sill Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. TautfestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Nolan v. MathisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API