Legal Opinion
Strack v. Roetzel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 13, 1915No. 4063PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Error from District Court, Blaine County; James R. Tolbert, Judge. 1 Action by Joseph P. Roetzel against Frank Strack. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
RITTENHOUSEj C.
This is an action instituted for the purpose of'requiring the plaintiff in error to specifically perform the conditions of the following contract, to-wit:
"This contract, made and entered into this 14th day of December, 1910, by and between Joseph P. Roetzel, party of the first part, and Frank Strack, party of the second part, witnesseth: The party of the first part agrees with his wife, Clara Roetzel, to sign, execute, and deliver to said party of the second part a good and sufficient warranty deed to and for the following described real estate to-wit: The northwest quarter of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Halsell v. Renfrow and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Campbell v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Williams v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Blanchard v. McDougalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
- Burnett v. KullakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ellis v. TreatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Saye v. Adams Loan & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Jones v. TautfestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Jennings v. New York Petroleum Royalty Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Miller v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.