Legal Opinion

Fulkerson v. Mara

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 2, 1918No. 8544PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. ' Action for specific performance by Dan Mara against Harley Fulkerson and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

WEST, C.

This action was instituted by defendant in error, plaintiff below, against plaintiff in error, defendant below, to compel the specific performance of a contract and for damages. Plaintiff alleged in substance that he had purchased by oral contract certain lots in the town of Drumright, Okla., for the sum of $550, having paid $100 of the purchase price, and went into possession of the premises, and had made valuable and lasting improvements thereon, and that said defendant in breach of said contract failed and refused to deliver deed to said premises, but had undertaken to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Halsell v. Renfrow and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  2. Halsell v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  3. Purcell v. CorderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Reid v. MixSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Collins v. LackeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. McCormick v. StonebrakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. McMaster v. GossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Duncan v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Fulp v. Sill Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API