Grant v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action on a policy of indemnity insurance issued to Thomas T. Harbeson and Mariam Harbeson.
The policy was issued in 1931 to the Harbesons, husband and wife, when they were the owners of a Studebaker automobile. The policy by its terms bound the defendant to indemnify the named assureds and any person who might drive the automobile with their consent, against liability up to $25,000 on account of injuries sustained by other persons through their operation of the car. In July, 1932, the Harbesons sold the Studebaker and bought a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Royal Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Lewis v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Wittenbrock v. BellmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Continental Insurance v. WickhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Radar v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Chase v. National Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- McKee v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.