Legal Opinion

Mosley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1993No. CR-91-885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON RETURN TO REMAND

On September 30, 1992, 616 So.2d 360, we remanded this cause to the circuit court for that court to explain why it had considered only one of the three convictions listed by Mosley as being contested in his A.R.Cr.P. 32 petition — two for receiving stolen property in the second degree (CC-80-618 and -833) and one for third degree burglary (CC-82-000-430). The circuit court, in response, explained that the three convictions were in fact the result of three separate proceedings; that, in the proceeding before this Court, the circuit court had considered only one of the 1980…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hobson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Hobbie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  3. State v. HobbieCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cantu v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Sammie Lee Gordon v. John E. Nagle, Warden Attorney General of the State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Gordon v. NagleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Cantu v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. McBurnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API