Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Nagle
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 30, 1994No. 1921941PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING EX MERO MOTU
The Court's opinion of March 25, 1994, is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor:
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has certified this question to us:
"Does the failure to inform an age-qualified defendant of his right to apply for youthful offender status deprive the trial court of jurisdiction to entertain a guilty plea, such that a subsequent challenge to that conviction cannot be barred by the limitations period of Ala.R.Crim.P. 32.2(c)?"
The question certified arose out of a habeas corpus petition brought by an Alabama…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Cantu v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Ex Parte ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Parish v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.