State v. Tessenar
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Judge.
Defendant’s first assignment of error challenges the sufficiency of the State’s evidence. This assignment of error is overruled.
Defendant next contends the court erred in permitting Officer Lutrick to testify over objection that defendant told him, “I am the man who did it.” This contention is without merit. The record affirmatively shows that this statement was volunteered by defendant before he was taken into custody. “Miranda warnings” are required only where a defendant is being subjected to custodial interrogation. State v. Fletcher and State v. Arnold, 279 N.C. 85, 181…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. PorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. . GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. MeadowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. McVaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973