State v. Bryant
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MALLARD, Chief Judge.
Defendants’ first assignment of error is to the failure of the court to allow their motions to quash the warrant as to each defendant on the grounds that the warrant was defective in that it failed to state a crime and failed to adequately describe the films involved so as to distinguish them from other items in their class.
The pertinent parts of G.S. 14-190.1, the statute under which the defendants were charged, read as follows:
“(a) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to intentionally disseminate obscenity in any public place. A person, firm or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Tad R. Knowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Edward A. Wild, Jr. And Louis CorradoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Court v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Cinema I Video, Inc. v. ThornburgCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. MayesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.