Legal Opinion

State v. Lowery

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 13, 1973No. 7313SC395Published

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for a continuance.

Ostensibly, defendant sought a continuance in order to obtain the presence of Billy Inman as.a witness; however, the motion to continue was not supported by affidavits setting forth the reasons for the motion or detailing what steps had been taken to secure his presence as a witness. Indeed, in response to questioning by the solicitor, defendant stated:

“I did not tell Billy Inman that I was going to be tried this week and I have not subpoenaed him. I thought he would come on his own.”

A motion for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. TessenarCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API