Legal Opinion
Air-A-Plane Corporation v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 13, 1969No. 61-62PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Judge *
After formal advertising, plaintiff Air-A-Plane Corporation entered into a fixed-price contract with the Army Chemical Corps to make over 1100 smoke generators (designated as M3A1). The total price at the outset was $607,101.04. The current dispute is the outcome of a large number of changes made by the Government after the award. In its decision the Armed Forces Board of Contract Appeals said that “[wjhile aware of the ‘Changes’ provision in the contract and of the Government’s right to order changes, [plaintiff] in bidding on the contract, had not anticipated that any…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- F. H. McGraw & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Alliant Techsystems, Inc., Global Environmental Solutions Business Division v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Krygoski Construction Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Becho, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense v. Freedom Ny, Inc., Freedom Ny, Inc. v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.