Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Chester

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1999PublishedCited by 168 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

This is a direct appeal from the denial of petitioner’s request for relief pursuant to the Post-Conviction Relief Act (PCRA). 1 For the reasons set forth herein, the order of the trial court is affirmed.

Petitioner and his co-defendant, Richard Laird, were convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death on May 21, 1988. 2 This court affirmed the convictions and sentence on direct appeal. Commonwealth v. Chester, 526 Pa. 578, 587 A.2d 1367 (1991). The docket reflects that a “pro se” “Petition Requesting Evidentiary Hearing on After discovered Evidence”…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by168 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. FearsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API