Commonwealth v. Chester
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY, Justice.
This is a direct appeal from the denial of petitioner’s request for relief pursuant to the Post-Conviction Relief Act (PCRA). 1 For the reasons set forth herein, the order of the trial court is affirmed.
Petitioner and his co-defendant, Richard Laird, were convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death on May 21, 1988. 2 This court affirmed the convictions and sentence on direct appeal. Commonwealth v. Chester, 526 Pa. 578, 587 A.2d 1367 (1991). The docket reflects that a “pro se” “Petition Requesting Evidentiary Hearing on After discovered Evidence”…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by168 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. FearsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.