Legal Opinion
Treece v. Village of Naperville
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 12, 1995No. 94 C 5548PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Naomi Treece brought this cause of action against defendants Steven Ho-ehstetler, Larry Dickson, Michael Sullivan, and the City of Naperville (“City”). The individual defendants are police officers for the City. Plaintiff seeks damages for malicious prosecution under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (count I), malicious prosecution under state law (count II), and intentional infliction of emotional distress (count III). Defendants have moved to dismiss all claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fabiano v. City of Palos HillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- GARDUNIO v. Town of CiceroDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Carroccia v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Padilla v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Reese v. MayDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.