Legal Opinion
Fabiano v. City of Palos Hills
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 25, 2002No. 1-00-1266PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cohen
Plaintiffs Sandra and Frank Fabiano brought suit against defendants, Palos Hills Police Chief Daniel L. Hurley, Palos Hills police officers Jack Roche and Steve Cardamone, and the City of Palos Hills (the City) raising an Illinois common law claim for malicious prosecution of Sandra Fabiano and a section 1983 civil rights claim (42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994)) based on the malicious prosecution of Sandra Fabiano. Frank Fabiano sought damages for loss of consortium. The trial court granted summary judgment on all counts of the complaint in favor of all defendants.
The Fabianos appeal both from the…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Foutch v. O'BRYANTIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Ofelia Randle v. City of AuroraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Cairel v. AlderdenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Stokes v. Board of Educ. of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Herbert Williams v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Vodak v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Johnson v. SavilleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.