Legal Opinion

Eureka Sandstone Co. v. Long

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1895No. 1491PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

Respondent Long built a court house for Pierce county; which building was accepted June 21, 1893. The county took from Long and his co-defendants a bond under § 2415 of the General Statutes. The bond was not signed by Long, hut was signed by all the other defendants, and was delivered to the county by Long and by the county accepted. Appellant, the Eureka Sandstone Company, furnished Long something over $16,000 worth of material, which was used in the construction of this courthouse, and only a part of which has been paid for, and brought…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. LinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  2. County of King v. FerryWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Ihrig v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Cockrill v. DavieMontana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Tingley v. Bellingham Bay Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. France v. Deep River Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Gary Realty Co. v. SwinneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  3. Jennings v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Slaght v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Commercial State Bank v. Palmerton-Moore Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API