Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ihrig v. Scott

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1893No. 780PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Kittitas County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

One John Scott entered into a contract with school district No. 3, Kittitas county, for the erection by him of a school house for said district. At the time the contract was entered into, said John Scott as principal and the other defendants as sureties, made and delivered to the officers of said school district a bond, of which the following is a substantial copy:

“Know all men by these presents: That we, John Scott as principal, and-sureties, are held and firmly bound unto William R. Abrams, John A. Shoudy, S. W. Barnes, P. H. W. Ross and L.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Faurote v. State ex rel. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
  3. County of Bay ex rel. Houghtaling v. BrockMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Faurote v. State ex rel. SwainIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PoetkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. National Surety Co. v. Bratnober Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Thompson v. Grider Implement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Reiff v. Redfield School BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  5. Barnett v. Blackstone Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API