Central Transport, Inc. v. Tracy
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellants contend they are not subject to sales and use tax assessments, but are entitled to exemption under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, and R.C. 5739.02(B)(10) and 5741.02(C)(3). Appellants claim that the activities in question have no substantial nexus with the state of Ohio, since the taxed items are not stored or even opened in Ohio, but are placed almost immediately on an outgoing truck headed out of state. Thus, appellants claim, the assessments are not within Ohio’s taxing power under the federal Commerce Clause.
The BTA, citing Norandex, Inc. v. Limbach…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Norandex, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Cyanamid Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Am. Cyanamid Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Cent. Transport, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Karvo Paving Co. v. TestaOhio Court of Appeals · 2019