Legal Opinion

Central Transport, Inc. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1995No. 94-1449PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants contend they are not subject to sales and use tax assessments, but are entitled to exemption under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, and R.C. 5739.02(B)(10) and 5741.02(C)(3). Appellants claim that the activities in question have no substantial nexus with the state of Ohio, since the taxed items are not stored or even opened in Ohio, but are placed almost immediately on an outgoing truck headed out of state. Thus, appellants claim, the assessments are not within Ohio’s taxing power under the federal Commerce Clause.

The BTA, citing Norandex, Inc. v. Limbach…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Norandex, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Cyanamid Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Am. Cyanamid Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Cent. Transport, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Karvo Paving Co. v. TestaOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API