Legal Opinion

Shotwell v. Shotwell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 1979No. 52418PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

The only issue on appeal is whether a person who is ordered, pursuant to a divorce decree, to make monthly payments to the mortgagee as support alimony must continue to make the payments to the former spouse when the house is sold and the mortgage discharged.

The parties to this action were divorced on March 3, 1977. The appellant, Joe Dan Eli Shotwell, was required to make alimony payments in the amount of $5,400.00, payable at the rate of $150.00 monthly, directly to Cheryl Rey Shotwell, appellee, and payments of $140.00 monthly to the mortgagee for her house payments for a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Kinsey v. KinseyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Kunc v. KuncSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Arakaki v. ArakakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Potter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Johnston v. GriffithCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Johnston v. GriffithCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Potter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API