Legal Opinion

Arakaki v. Arakaki

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1972No. 5214PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

RICHARDSON, C.J.

This is an appeal from an order denying libelleeappellant’s motion to set aside a final decree of divorce. Pursuant to Revised Laws of Hawaii (1965 Supp.), service of process was effected by registered mail since appellant was an employee of the Federal Government working in Japan. In an ex parte proceeding on March 19, 1966, the court granted the interlocutory decree of divorce which appellant now contests. That decree ordered appellant to convey his “rights, title and interest” in certain real property to his wife, libellant-appellee, and to hold…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Kinsey v. KinseyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. de Nobrega v. de NobregaHawaii Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bryant v. BryantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Cain v. CainHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Cleveland v. ClevelandHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Sandusky v. SanduskyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Moss v. American International Adjustment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API