Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 1969No. 43155PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McINERNEY, Justice.

Owen Richard Johnson, as plaintiff in a divorce action, was found guilty of contempt of court for not complying with the provision in the divorce decree requiring him to make monthly payments in a specified amount to his former wife. Plaintiff appeals on the ground that failure to comply with the terms of the divorce decree is not a proper basis for contempt proceedings. The judgment granting the divorce and settling the property rights of the respective parties does not designate the sum to be paid to the defendant wife as either alimony or as a division of the property.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lemons v. LemonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Ex Parte BighorseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Hicks v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Battles v. BattlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Gade v. LofflerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Shea v. SheaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. Potter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Hough v. HoughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. Huchteman v. HuchtemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Sommer v. SommerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API