Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnston v. Griffith

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 27, 1984No. 59241Published

1DissentBrightmire, Presiding Judge

I think the trial judge correctly determined that the divorce decree specifically provided for “support alimony.” It required the alimony to be paid by liquidating the mortgage indebtedness on the house and car awarded to the woman. Thus as I see it the crucial question is not whether the periodic payments in question are for “support” or for property division, but whether under the circumstances the court had authority to overrule, as it were, the command of 12 O.S.Supp.1976 § 1289(B), that support alimony payments end with death or remarriage of the recipient and require such payments to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Ettinger v. EttingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Shotwell v. ShotwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API