Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Smania
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided September 4, 1997No. 85818, 85819PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
701 So.2d 835 (1997)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Mary Ann SMANIA and Carolyn Fankhanel, Respondents.
Nos. 85818, 85819.
Supreme Court of Florida.
September 4, 1997.
Rehearing Denied November 24, 1997.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director; John T. Berry, Staff Counsel; Mary Ellen Bateman, UPL Counsel and Lori S. Holcomb, Assistant UPL Counsel, Tallahassee, and Barry W. Rigby, Branch UPL Counsel, Orlando, for Complainant.
Mary Ann Smanie, Oakland Park, pro se.
Carolyn Fankhanel, St. Petersburg, pro se.
Linsey Moore, Melbourne, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
We have for review the complaint of The Florida Bar…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. SperrySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- The Florida Bar v. FurmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- The Florida Bar v. GreeneSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Florida Bar re Advisory Opinion-Nonlawyer Preparation of Living TrustsSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. MiravalleSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- State v. PalmerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- The Florida Bar Re: Advisory Opinion - Shore v. WallSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
- The Florida Bar Re: Advisory Opinion - Shore v. WallSupreme Court of Florida · 2018